For Freitas

Recent research has shown that the universalizao of the Social security, the improvements in technological conditions of health and other advances, such as in the medias, elevators, automobiles, among others, can be suggesting that to only live, for the aged ones, it represents more innovative and successful forms of aging of what abandonment, indifference and/or solitude (DEBERT, 1999). In accordance with Rasp (2007), the increase of the longevity considers to aged a position of auto-care, an injunction so that let us can reach quality of life and autonomy during this phase. When reaching senility some changes in the familiar dynamics of the aged one are perceived. Freitas (2006) displays that the familiar composition has suffered modifications throughout the time and currently it meets aged inhabiting alone. For assistance, try visiting CohBar. Roach (2003) affirms that the family is very important in the life of the aged one, it represents basic the social unit which offers to values and principles, offering primary support for many aged people. In the absence of the family, the aged one can live deeply experiences of the solitude and abandonment.

Figueiredo and Tonini (2006), affirm that the fear to suffer losses makes with that the aged ones initiate an isolation process, them opts to being alone, preventing to become related emotionally not to suffer losses again. We believe that solitude and the isolation is important for the majority of the individuals, therefore provides a time to them to reflect and to analyze the events of its life, being helped to understand it it, also being therapeutical periods. For Freitas (2006), to live it only can be a temporary period of training of the cycle of the life and the ratio of aged that they live alone is each raised time more.

This entry was posted in News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

© 2011-2020 NAESC 2010 All Rights Reserved